Disentangling Mindfulness from Buddhism
Mo Edjlali made the case for clearly separating secular mindfulness from its Buddhist origins. While acknowledging Buddhism as a valuable philosophical root, he emphasized that mindfulness, to serve broader and more diverse communities, must evolve beyond its religious entanglement. Drawing parallels to how algebra evolved beyond its Islamic origins, and how Buddhism itself grew from Vedic traditions, Edjlali argued that mindfulness can only grow if it is allowed to stand on its own — free of religious gatekeeping. This shift is essential to address ethical concerns, avoid covert “stealth Buddhism,” and make the practice truly inclusive.
Moving Beyond One-Dimensional Thinking
Edjlali critiqued the overly rigid and simplified teaching of mindfulness attitudes such as “non-judging,” “acceptance,” and “letting go.” He proposed a more psychologically sound and socially responsible framework grounded in dialectical thinking — for example, balancing acceptance with advocacy for change, or non-striving with goal-orientation. These both/and pairings reflect the complexity of real life, especially for non-monastics navigating jobs, parenting, and stress. This approach encourages flexibility, critical engagement, and adaptation to modern challenges.
Proposing Open MBSR: A Collaborative Future
The final section of the session introduced Open MBSR — a reimagined, open-source model for mindfulness instruction. Drawing inspiration from agile development and the open-source tech movement, Edjlali presented a decentralized, principle-based approach focused on transparency, equity, and continuous improvement. Open MBSR is designed to empower individuals rather than centralize authority, avoid guru-dependence, and promote a self-sustaining ecosystem of mindfulness practice. Core values include integrity, critical thinking, scientific grounding, and collective wisdom.
Final Thoughts
Mo Edjlali’s session offered a bold and necessary critique of the current mindfulness landscape, with a roadmap for its next evolution. Through disentanglement from religious roots, adoption of dialectical thinking, and the creation of a truly open, inclusive framework, Open MBSR aims to return mindfulness to the people — flexible, transparent, and grounded in community.
If mindfulness is to serve real people in real life — beyond rigid attitudes and hidden agendas — it must evolve. In Open MBSR: Reimagining the Future of Mindfulness, Mo Edjlali offers a transparent, community-led framework grounded in dialectical thinking and collective empowerment. Move beyond guru culture, stealth Buddhism, and one-size-fits-all teachings — and help shape a flexible, inclusive, and truly open mindfulness movement.
This article is part of our Best of Summit series where we spotlight the most compelling sessions from our summit.
4 comments
Thank you for the work you all done to bring mindfulness to the people living on our planet. I have an appreciation for this integrative conversation as I am not a practicing Buddhist and do not think excluding them from being Mindful Leaders is not continuing the inclusion of acknowledging our interconnected as human beings… being human. To me it weakens our life on this planet, when we foster separation. I appreciate all sects and the freedom for all of us to practice Being Mindful. Inclusion not exclusion.
MBSR is inclusive of me who is a non practicing member. We are born into this world and our religion is chosen for us by our elders. Buddhism, to me has greater freedom to be human than do all other entities. And, remember I am not a Buddhist. Letting go is a practice, worthy of adopting as is inclusion. Room for everyone and every point of view. My question is what is missing here in the Mindful Leaders Organization? When we identify what is missing ? It is not wrong that is is missing. IT is just missing!
Kathlen, thanks for your thoughtful note.
I hear you—and I appreciate your spirit of inclusion. We’re not trying to exclude Buddhists or deny their contribution. I’ve learned a lot from Buddhist teachings myself. What we’re pointing to is the entanglement—when spiritual or institutional power starts to shape programs that are supposed to be secular and for everyone. It can lead to deception and a breakdown in trust.
Open MBSR is about making room for all of us—Buddhists, skeptics, the spiritual, the secular. Not watering things down, but opening them up. And you're right: what's missing isn't wrong. That’s the kind of open reflection we need more of. Glad you're part of this conversation.
Hi Mo:
I love your idea of disengaging mindfulness from Buddhism because it will allow diverse people access to this wisdom, who might otherwise be turned off, but I have to say I see a problem...that this will also divorce the consumer from a staggering wealth of resources, which, to me, would be such a loss. My journey has led me to discover dharma : ancient wisdom on how to live well today, and I have been gobsmacked by how much wonderful help is out there - mostly for free or by donation. I am learning and growing today because of my exposure to Buddhist practices and people - so many generous, kind, wise people! So, for me, my MBSR training opened doors, and offered a lifelong path of discovery.and continual learning. Perhaps that is not for everyone, but I did want to give you my 2 cents worth! Otherwise - brilliant ideas and a great way to make mindfulness accessible to more people!
All the best,
Joanne
Hi Joanne, Thank you so much for sharing your perspective—I really appreciate it.
You’re absolutely right: the dharma holds a staggering wealth of insight, and so many Buddhist teachers have offered their time and wisdom with deep generosity. I’ve personally benefited from that too, and I’m grateful for it.
The goal with Open MBSR isn’t to throw any of that away. It’s to create a clear container—so people can access mindfulness without feeling like they’re stepping into a belief system, whether explicitly or subtly. For those who do want to explore the dharma more deeply, that path is still wide open. But for those who don’t, or aren’t sure, they shouldn’t feel like outsiders.
In a way, we’re not closing any doors, we’re just opening more.
Leave a comment